Types of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Types of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Types of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an campaign that is aggressive gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs for the Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an district that is indian. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to displace self-government and control over land and resources represents a substantial “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is really what happened once that space was recovered.

The topic of this paper addresses an understudied and essential period in the history of the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a body that is growing of in the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks as the Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the battle to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, plus the grouped community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power inside the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse while the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking Mashpee community identity. This research examines reports that are legislative petitions, letters, and legal documents to create a narrative of Native agency when you look at the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation together with Evolving Community Identity within the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to public venues: Local Actors together with Creation of National Parklands within the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and non-governmental organizations in the creation of parklands for the American South. While current historiography primarily credits the government because of the development of parks and protection of natural wonders, a study of parklands into the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the necessity of local and non-government sources when it comes to preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the importance of a bureaucracy that is national the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but concentrate on opposition into the imposition of new rules governing land when confronted with some outside threat. In spite of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative, the importance of local individuals within the creation of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history. Several examples within the American South raise concerns in regards to the narrative that is traditional governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained interest in both nature preservation and in creating spaces for public recreation at the local level, and finds that the “private road to public parks” merits further investigation.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks in the American South” was subsequently selected for publication within the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced a rich literature in regards to the Levellers and their role in the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily focused on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to increase the espousal and franchise of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a sect that is fragmented of radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they could make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to find a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their ideas that are religious. Instead of centering on John Lilburne, often taken once the public face for the Leveller movement, this paper will focus on the equally intriguing and much more thinker that is consistent William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement into the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, i really hope to declare that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism when confronted with violent sectarians who sought to wield control over the Church of England. Even though the Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s dedication to a tolerant society and a secular state should not be minimized but rather seen as element of a bigger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper aims to subscribe to the rich historiography of religious toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: A Case Study of the First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have never only proliferated rapidly–they are becoming the expectation that is normative American society. When it comes to the greater part of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have lead to no permanent memory sites and also the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the city plus the nation could your investment tragedy and move ahead. All of this changed on May 29, 1989 once the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial into the thirteen people killed in the”post that is infamous shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the actual situation of Edmond in order to understand just why it became the first memory site of this kind in united states of america history. I argue that the little town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time of this shooting, coupled with the total that is near involvement established ideal conditions when it comes to emergence of this unique sort of memory site. I also conduct a historiography regarding the usage of “the ribbon” to be able to illustrate how it offers become the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society in the late 20th century. Lastly, I illustrate how the lack that is notable of between people active in the Edmond and Oklahoma City cases following the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity of those cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising amount of aesthetic similarities that these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The pursuit of Postmortem Identity through the Pax Romana”

“I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription if you want to know who. The Romans dealt with death in lots of ways which incorporated a selection of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as in the case buy essays associated with “ash and embers.” The romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained by the turn of the first century of this era. Cremation vanished by the 3rd century, replaced by the practice regarding the distant past because of the fifth century. Burial first began to take hold within the western Roman Empire throughout the early second century, with the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites from the Roman world would not discuss the practices of cremation and burial in more detail. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in as a type of burial vessels such as for example urns and sarcophagi represented the actual only real location to move to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the world that is roman. This paper analyzed a tiny corpus of such vessels in order to identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of these symbols to your fragments of text available associated with death in the world that is roman. The analysis concluded that the transition to inhumantion was a movement caused by an increased desire from the right section of Romans to preserve identity in death during and after the Pax Romana.

Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *